Uncovering the Next Generation's Hall of Fame
Orchestral Manoeuvres in the DarkNot in the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame | |||||||||||||||||
Eligible since: 2005First Recording: 1979Previously Considered? No what's this? |
|
Essential Albums (?) | Wikipedia | YouTube | |
Architecture & Morality (1981) | ☆ | ☊ | |
Dazzle Ships (1983) | ☆ | ☊ |
Essential Songs (?) | Wikipedia | YouTube | |
Enola Gay (1980) | ☆ | ☊ | |
Electricity (1980) | ☆ | ☊ | |
Locomotion (1984) | ☆ | ☊ | |
So in Love (1984) | ☆ | ☊ | |
If You Leave (1986) | ☆ | ☊ | |
Dreaming (1988) | ☆ | ☊ |
Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark @ Wikipedia
Will Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark be inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame? "Musical excellence is the essential qualification for induction." |
Share
Comments
19 comments so far (post your own)http://www.rollingstone.com/music/videos/omd-marvel-over-synthpops-growing-fanbase-20130415 Posted by Roy on Tuesday, 04/16/2013 @ 20:56pm |
OMD were always the weirdos who sold millions of records, but never had an image, never got asked for an autograph in public, never were at the big parties, never did Band Aid or Live Aid, never got played on radio (well, after their songs left the charts). That they leave this earth never having been inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame is pretty much fitting for them. Posted by Nermen on Sunday, 11/13/2016 @ 15:51pm |
ELECTRIC LIGHT ORCHESTRA Posted by Roy on Sunday, 11/13/2016 @ 19:47pm |
Great post, Nermen. I'm especially partial to Dazzle Ships, probably OMD's most experimental and challenging work. It's a synthlover's (I fit that bill like a glove) dream. Posted by Zach on Monday, 11/14/2016 @ 10:21am |
OMD are fooking wonderful. No chance are they ever going to be recognized by the HoF, though. Posted by Jimmy Jacobs on Sunday, 10/29/2017 @ 23:33pm |
OMD: Posted by Redhead on Sunday, 02/18/2018 @ 13:21pm |
There's public cool, and there's music elitist cool. Despite being very influential, OMD are somehow neither. They'll never go in, but that doesn't mean they weren't mindblowingly awesome. Their run of singles and albums from 1979 through 1983 is actually peerless, as far as I'm concerned. Posted by Moosh on Wednesday, 04/24/2019 @ 18:13pm |
Their first four albums - OMD, Organisation, Architecture/Morality and Dazzle Ships - are knockouts. Later albums English Electric and Punishment of Luxury are comparable to those early classics. The rest of their discography is a pretty mixed bag, with good-ish records (Junk Culture, Crush, History of Modern), "meh" ones (Sugar Tax, Universal), and shitty ones (Pacific Age, Liberator). Great live band, influenced a bunch of later groups like St. Etienne, Moby, Leftfield and LCD Soundsystem. I say put 'em in. Posted by Gustuf on Saturday, 02/29/2020 @ 13:31pm |
I should add that it's shocking how OMD have no "essential" albums or songs (besides If You Leave) according to this site. Really, the lauded, multi-million selling Architecture/Morality isn't essential listening, especially for electronic fans? Dazzle Ships, while not as popular, was arguably even more influential. As for singles, do era-defining, multi-million selling releases like Enola Gay, Souvenir, Joan of Arc and Maid of Orleans (German's biggest single of 1982) not count? Needless to say, every little fart by the endlessly derivative Radiohead is deemed "essential"... Posted by Gustuf on Saturday, 02/29/2020 @ 23:43pm |
How on earth can OMD not have any essential albums according to this site? Architecture & Morality and Dazzle Ships, anyone? Multiple artists – Mark Ronson, Moby, Neil Hannon, St. Etienne, Owen Pallett, to name a few – have spoken effusively about the influence those albums had on them. Posted by Lordage on Monday, 01/25/2021 @ 03:29am |
The fact that this website only lists "If You Leave" as essential listening goes to show how biased this website is to an American perspective, and this is coming from an American. Posted by Iccwi on Tuesday, 02/16/2021 @ 12:25pm |
Lol, just to join in the "OMD are undervalued" discussion/rage. It's dumbfounding how the music press will perpetuate their chosen ones, but ignore a totally seminal band like OMD because they're somehow "unworthy". The number of major artists who cite OMD as an influence (Depeche, Pet Shops, New Order, Frankie, No Doubt, to name a mere sampling) is staggering. If one of Rolling Stone's chosen ones had been cited by even half as many acts, they'd be touted as the greatest band in the history of all bands. Hopefully the "writers of music history" will one day let go of their biases, stop fellating the same "classic" names for five seconds, and acknowledge the greatness of OMD and their impact on popular music. Posted by Rue on Thursday, 03/11/2021 @ 08:15am |
This site is showing a staggering ignorance of OMD's legacy. One "essential" recording, while Howard Jones, who never influenced anybody and by his own admission aped OMD, has three. Pathetic. Posted by Aldo on Saturday, 05/1/2021 @ 04:03am |
Hey admins: please do the right thing and add 'Dazzle Ships' (1983) to essential albums, and "Electricity" (1979) and "Souvenir" (1981) to essential songs. Assuming the site doesn't have a vendetta against OMD and that there's simply a good faith lack of awareness (it's impossible to keep track of every record, I know), Google/Wikipedia is only a second away and can verify the irrefutable influence of these releases. The numerous essential recordings listed for the commercially "kinda there" likes of Echo & the Bunnymen and KLF would indicate that influence and peer respect are sufficient to make a piece of music "essential". So there's no apparent justification for the exclusion of the aforementioned OMD recordings. Posted by Lordage on Sunday, 10/17/2021 @ 16:20pm |
Cannot believe that OMD is not recognized in hall of fame, there sound made the 80s. I get it though they are not American enough!!!! Such a shame they really have a big fan base though, i think in the future they should be recognized for that classic 80s techno sound we love. Posted by Margaret Alexander on Thursday, 04/28/2022 @ 18:38pm |
OMD basically defined the electric 80s along with Numan and the Human League. Their first 4 albums (first 6 if you can accept the band mainstreaming their sound) are brilliant! Their post-reunion stuff is surprisingly great too. Posted by Brian Mills on Monday, 06/20/2022 @ 19:12pm |
Could the site explain why OMD has so few "essential" recordings listed here? I see this is a point of contention among previous posters. If the site purports to provide a genuine accounting of what was important in music history then there should (clearly) be many more pieces of OMD music listed (the absence of the seminal Electricity from 1979 is *particularly* egregious). Posted by Bart M on Wednesday, 04/26/2023 @ 01:42am |
OMD totally deserve induction based on influence and sales. Unfortunately there is no transparent entry criteria, it basically comes down to what the committee arbitrarily decides is "deserving" that year. And we can see from past inductions that they prefer Americans who play guitars, over geeky Europeans with synthesizers. You have to wonder if even Depeche Mode (who, by the way, exist directly because of OMD) would have gotten in, had they not increased their electric guitar quotient over the years. Kraftwerk were eligible for what, 25+ years before the committee decided they were "worthy"? *shakes head* Posted by Crick Potter on Tuesday, 10/10/2023 @ 09:54am |
If the hall is in UK, they are shoe-in. However, like many UK acts, their lacking of success in the United States hurts their chance. Human League, OMD, Gary Numan have similar low chances to be inducted. Pet Shop Boys will have better chance than these artists I mentioned. Posted by power on Tuesday, 10/10/2023 @ 10:00am |
Future Rock Legends is your home for Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark and the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, including year of eligibility, number of nominations, induction chances, essential songs and albums, and an open discussion of their career.
This site is not affiliated with the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum.